Before I begin:
The following is not a critique or condoning of any specific stance. While I believe in the Second Amendment, I also believe that we should be smarter in how firearms are regulated. I hope you find this well thought out and logical.
The following is not a critique or condoning of any specific stance. While I believe in the Second Amendment, I also believe that we should be smarter in how firearms are regulated. I hope you find this well thought out and logical.
So after yet another mass
shooting, we get the usual clamor for more gun control and how no one seems to
ever do anything about. Sure, cries to
ban assault weapons is always cried out, but nothing ever comes of it. And no one seems to offer any real practical ideas. Well, I have one. It won't solve the problem completely, but it
would definitely be an improvement, and quite possibly could have prevented
what happened in Orlando.
One of the questions brought
up is why was the suspect able to buy weapons when he had been investigated
several times by the FBI? Even though he
had the proper permit to do so, shouldn't this have been part of the decision? The answer is this: there is none to little cross checking in our
government agencies. This 'wall' has led
to other big situations in the past, for example 9-11. My solution is thus:
1. Create a national database of the people who
have been in trouble with the law (including the above mentioned
investigations) that all government agencies have to contribute to.
2. Whenever anyone buys a weapon from a gun
store or similar store, the buyer has to submit their social security number,
ID or license number as well as a scan of at least one finger. This information is sent to the database and
if there is any potential conflict, the purchase request is flagged and
checked. If it turns out to be a false
flag, it is disregarded. If not, then
the sale is denied and the reason(s) are both entered and updated in the
database, as well as sent back to the store, where it is given back to the
potential purchaser along with instructions on how challenge this ruling if
necessary.
All the shops that sell firearms
would be required to participate in this program and will need a finger scanner
and internet connection for this, which honestly is not that expensive.
While this is not an end all
to the problem, it would definitely help reduce the problem more than a simple
ban of certain firearms or the 'closing of firearm show loopholes' some people
always like to bring up. Think about
it: what do the last several mass
shootings have in common? Answer: all their weapons were bought legally, yet
after the fact it was found that there were red flags in one government
department that wasn't discovered due to each agency not sharing potential
valuable information.
We need to think smarter on
this, otherwise it will keep going in the vicious cycle it has been going
in. I mean they keep hammering the point
that those on a government watch or no-fly list shouldn't be getting firearms. Using my solution would help fix that.
Just my thoughts...
No comments:
Post a Comment